The Principle of Divinity in Indonesia's National Legal Order: Legitimation, Interpretation, and Control
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59261/jlsp.v4i5.310Keywords:
Principle of Divinity, national legal order, legitimation function, legal harmonization, freedom of religionAbstract
Background: The Principle of Divinity, rooted in the first precept of Pancasila and Article 29 of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, is a constitutional value that should guide the formation, interpretation, and review of law. Its practical translation remains uneven, particularly in matters concerning freedom of religion and belief.
Objective: This study examines three interrelated functions of the Principle of Divinity—legitimation, interpretation, and control—and their implications for legal certainty and substantive justice.
Methods: This normative-doctrinal study employs statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. Primary legal materials comprise constitutional provisions, legislation, and selected decisions of the Constitutional Court and the Supreme Court of Indonesia. Reports published by the SETARA Institute are used solely as secondary contextual sources, rather than as empirical data collected by the authors.
Results: The analysis shows that the three functions operate sequentially but are translated into legal norms and practice inconsistently. Legitimation may be undermined when implementing regulations impose disproportionate barriers; interpretation varies across judicial decisions; and judicial control remains selective. The analysis of regulations and judicial decisions supports the identification of inconsistencies in value translation and the development of a six-stage harmonization model. SETARA Institute monitoring indicates persistent violations of freedom of religion or belief; however, the reported figures are treated as contextual indicators rather than as evidence of causation.
Conclusion: The central problem lies in the inconsistent translation of the Principle of Divinity from philosophical and constitutional values into legislation, institutional interpretation, judicial control, and legal practice. Continuous harmonization is necessary to align constitutional values concerning religion with the principles of equality, human dignity, and the protection of rights.
References
Ananda, A. I., La Ode Dedihasriadi, Pery Rehendra Sucipta, Yeni Haerani, & Baskhoro, A. E. (2026). PREVENTING MAJORITARIAN VETO IN HOUSE OF WORSHIP LICENSING: A HUMAN RIGHTS-BASED DUE PROCESS MODEL. Harmoni, 25(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.32488/harmoni.v25i1.1075
Arifinsyah, A., & Sofian, A. (2021). Regulation on worship house establishment and implication towards minority relation of religious people majority in Indonesia. International Journal of Social Sciences, 4(1), 106–113. https://doi.org/10.31295/ijss.v4n1.1396
Butt, S. (2023). Indonesia’s new Criminal Code: indigenising and democratising Indonesian criminal law? Griffith Law Review, 32(2), 190–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/10383441.2023.2243772
Dworkin, R. (1986). Law’s Empire. Harvard University Press.
Friedman, L. M. (1975). The legal system: A social science perspective . Russell Sage Foundation.
Giri Wardana, M. R., Husnan, A. G., Said, M., & Makmur, K. L. (2025). Between Divinity and Liberty: Rethinking Religious Freedom under Indonesia’s Constitution. Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan, 5(2), 264–275. https://doi.org/10.52738/pjk.v5i2.750
Gusman, D., & Arnetti, S. (2023). Makna sila ketuhanan yang maha esa sebagai cita hukum. UNES Journal of Swara Justisia, 7(2), 836. https://doi.org/10.31933/ujsj.v7i2.385
Hart, H. L. A. (1961). The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hasani, I., & Halili, H. (2022). Human Rights and Constitutionality Issues of Blasphemy Law in Indonesia. Jurnal Konstitusi, 19(2), 406. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1927
Heryansyah, D., & Sahid Hadi. (2024). Anomali Perlindungan Kebebasan Beragama dan Berkeyakinan di Mahkamah Agung. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 31(2), 434–460. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol31.iss2.art9
Indrayanti, K. W., & Saraswati, A. A. A. N. (2022). Criminalizing and penalizing blasphemy: the need to adopt a human rights approach in the reform of Indonesia’s blasphemy law. Cogent Social Sciences, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2022.2104704
Kelsen, H. (1967). Pure theory of law. Max Knight, trans. University of California Press.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2010). Putusan Nomor 140/PUU-VII/2009.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2017). Putusan Nomor 97/PUU-XIV/2016.
Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia. (2025). Putusan Nomor 146/PUU-XXII/2024.
Manu, K. V. D. J. S. and D. R. R. (2024). Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Kebebasan Memeluk Agama Dan Kepercayaan di Indonesia Berdasarkan Pasal 29 UUD 1945 . Jurnal Lex Privatum.
Piter, R., & Riyanto, F. X. E. A. (2024). Memahami Sila “Ketuhanan Yang Maha Esa” Pancasila dalam Perspektif Filsafat Gabriel Marcel. Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan, 4(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.52738/pjk.v4i1.414
Rifqi Ridlo Phahlevy. (2023). Balancing religious traditions and legal neutrality: the independence of indonesia’s constitutional court. Russian Law Journal, 11(5s). https://doi.org/10.52783/rlj.v11i5s.928
Rofii, A., & Hosen, N. (2022). The Constitutionalization of ‘Religious Values’ in Indonesia. In Constitutional Democracy in Indonesia (pp. 241–260). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192870681.003.0012
Roky Huzaeni, M. (2022). Kedudukan Hukum Pancasila dan Konstitusi dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia. Pancasila: Jurnal Keindonesiaan, 114–125. https://doi.org/10.52738/pjk.v2i1.83
Said, M. R. A. and Z. F. A. (2025). Faith, Fear, and the Constitution: Religious Freedom and Identity Politics in Indonesia’s Constitutional Jurisprudence. Indonesian Constitutional Studies , 1(1), 53–76.
SETARA Institute. (2024). Kondisi kebebasan beragama dan berkeyakinan 2023: Dari stagnasi menuju stagnasi baru. SETARA Institute.
SETARA Institute. (2025). Kondisi kebebasan beragama dan berkeyakinan (FoRB) di Indonesia pada tahun 2024: Regresi di tengah transisi. SETARA Institute.
Soekanto, S. (2018). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum menurut Soerjono Soekanto. Recidive, 7(2).
Suryawati, N., & Syaputri, M. D. (2022). Intoleransi Dalam Pembangunan Rumah Ibadah Berdasarkan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia, 4(3), 433–446. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v4i3.433-446
Tahir, E. (2023). Pemaknaan pancasila dalam sistem hukum indonesia. Yustitia, 9(2), 133–157. https://doi.org/10.31943/yustitia.v10i2.194
Wahab, A. J., Mustolehudin, Ahmad, A. K., Arafah, S., Haryanto, J. T., Oetomo, S. B., Kustini, & M, F. (2024). A theological approach to the construction of houses of worship in Indonesia. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2356914
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ongen Michel Timisela, Marthinus Johanes Saptenno, Renny Heronia Nendissa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
