Pick-Up Service Transaction Manipulation Crimes in the Banking Legal Domain: A Model for Customer Legal Protection
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59261/jlsp.v4i4.270Keywords:
Crime, Manipulation, Pick Up Service, BankingAbstract
Background: Pick-up service cash deposits increase convenience but expose customers to risks of manipulation during cash handover, transaction recording, and account crediting. The issue does not arise from a complete regulatory void; rather, existing banking, consumer-protection, anti-fraud, contractual, and governance rules do not specifically integrate the risk allocation and evidentiary safeguards required for this service.
Objective: This study analyzes when irregularities in pick-up service cash transactions constitute banking crimes or general crimes and formulates a customer-protection model.
Methods: Normative legal research was conducted through statutory and conceptual analysis of banking, consumer-protection, anti-fraud, and related legal materials. One interview concerning supervisory practices was used solely as supporting contextual material and analyzed descriptively to identify operational vulnerability points; it did not alter the normative research design.
Results: Manipulation of bank records, bookkeeping, documents, or transaction data by legally specified banking actors may fall within applicable banking-crime provisions, whereas the appropriation of entrusted funds or the use of deceit without such manipulation is assessed under applicable general criminal law. Internal fraud is treated as a governance and risk classification rather than as an independent offense. The study identifies eight operational vulnerability points, from scheduling to complaint handling, and proposes four protection layers: contractual, operational, institutional, and recovery protection.
Conclusion: The Layered Customer Protection Model is proposed as a normative framework to strengthen legal certainty, evidentiary protection, internal controls, complaint handling, and pathways for customer recovery, subject to implementation and further empirical evaluation.
References
Anugrahita, R., & Baidhowi. (2025). Prinsip Kehati-hatian Dalam Perbankan Dan Akad Murabahah. Jurnal Akademik Ekonomi Dan Manajemen, 2(2).
Arens, Randal J. Elder, Mark S. Beasley, & Chris E. Hogan. (2024). Auditing And Assurance Services. In Pearson Education Limited.
Atmadja, I. N. P. B. , and I. N. P. B. B. (2018). Teori-teori hukum.
Azlina, N., Maesarach, R. M., & Said, M. (2022). Islamic Economic Methodology Aproach to Achieve Economic Equity: Epistemological Study. BASKARA?: Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.54268/baskara.v4i2.12189
Borg, E., & Hooker, B. (2019). Epistemic Virtues Versus Ethical Values in the Financial Services Sector. Journal of Business Ethics, 155(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-017-3547-x
Djoni, G. S., & Rachmadi, U. (2012). Hukum Perbankan. Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.
Firmanto, T. (2024). Metodologi penelitian hukum: Panduan komprehensif penulisan ilmiah bidang hukum. PT. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.
Fuady, M. (2005). Perbuatan melawan hukum (Pendekatan kontemporer).
Gunawan, I. (2024). Upaya Preventif dan Represif dalam Penanggulangan Kebocoran Data Pada Penyelenggaraan Pinjaman Online. Officium Notarium, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.20885/jon.vol4.iss1.art3
Halim, G., Zarzani, T. R., & Aspan, H. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Pegawai Bank Yang Melakukan Tindak Pidana Penggelapan Dalam Jabatan Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998 Tentang Perbankan. Jurnal Rectum, 4(2).
Harahap, N. and N. H. (2025). Beyond the Liberty-Justice Dichotomy: A Constitutional-Maqasid Synthesis for Indonesia’s Plural Legal Order . KASTA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Agama, Budaya Dan Terapan, 5(3), 980–1003.
Kusuma, M. J. and M. S. (2019). Hukum perlindungan nasabah bank: Upaya hukum melindungi nasabah bank terhadap tindak kejahatan ITE di bidang perbankan. Nusamedia.
Muktar, B. (2016). Bank dan lembaga keuangan lain. Prenada Media.
Ningsih, S. (2021). Dampak Dana Pihak Ketiga Bank Konvensional Dan Bank Syariah Serta Pertumbuhan Ekonomi Di Indonesia. In Paper Knowledge . Toward a Media History of Documents (Vol. 3, Number April).
Purnomo, P., Kadi Sukarna, Muhammad Junaidi, Kukuh Sudarmanto, & Miftah Arifin. (2026). Pertanggungjawaban Korporasi atas Kelalaian Karyawan Bank di Indonesia. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v9i3.12709
Putera, A. P. (2019). Hukum Perbankan?: Analisis Mengenai Prinsip, Produk, Risiko Dan Manajemen Risiko Dalam Perbankan. In Sustainability (Switzerland) (Vol. 11, Number 1).
Rasyid, F. M. (2026). Ekonomi digital: Konsep, transformasi, inovasi dan tantangan. Star Digital Publishing.
Rosidi, A. (2026). Metodologi Penelitian Hukum: Teori, Paradigma, Dan Praktik Kontemporer. Cv. Edu Akademi.
Saputra, A. (2025). Menjaga Kepercayaan Dalam Transaksi Keuangan: Pengaturan Prinsip Kepercayaan di Bank. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 2(5).
Taklima, M., Sulistiyono, A., & Syamsudin, M. (2023). CONSUMER PROTECTION AS AN INSTRUMENT FOR FULFILLING HUMAN RIGHTS IN THE ECONOMIC SECTOR AND ITS CONSTITUTIONALIZING EFFORTS IN THE 1945 CONSTITUTION. Jurisdictie: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syariah, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.18860/j.v14i1.20844
Zainal Asikin. (2015). Pengantar hukum perbankan Indonesia.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 I Made Aditya Mantara Putra, Johannes Ibrahim Kosasih, I Putu Suwantara
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
