Validity of Conditions Precedent Based on Contingent Legal Due Diligence Findings under Indonesian Contract Law

Ade Putra Indrawan; Joshua Pratama Saha

doi:10.59261/jlsp.v4i4.263

Authors

Ade Putra Indrawan Universitas Pelita Harapan
Joshua Pratama Saha Universitas Pelita Harapan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59261/jlsp.v4i4.263

Keywords:

Conditions Precedent, Legal Title Due Diligence, Suspensive Condition, Freedom of Contract, Potestative Condition

Abstract

Background: Legal Title Due Diligence (LTDD) findings in property transactions do not always reveal established title defects. Boundary disputes, indications of overlapping land certificates, potential third-party claims, and incomplete licensing processes may remain contingent but are often incorporated as conditions precedent in transaction agreements.

Objective: This study examines the validity of such clauses based on the requirements for valid agreements, conditional obligations, and the limits of freedom of contract under the Indonesian Civil Code.

Methods: This normative legal study applies statutory, conceptual, and analytical approaches to Articles 1253–1267, 1320, and 1332–1339 of the Civil Code, alongside land law and regulations governing Preliminary Sale and Purchase Agreements (Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli or PPJB).

Results: The findings show that contingency does not automatically invalidate a contractual clause. An uncertain future event may constitute a valid conditional obligation when it is possible, lawful, objectively verifiable, and not solely dependent on one party’s discretion. Uncertainty regarding the magnitude of risk also does not make the contractual subject matter indefinite when the principal subject matter, materiality thresholds, evidence of satisfaction, and legal consequences remain determinable. However, contractual freedom is exceeded when clauses postpone mandatory requirements applicable before PPJB execution, grant absolute discretion without objective standards, or permit a benefiting party to control fulfillment of the condition.

Conclusion: This study proposes a seven-layer validity test and a model clause incorporating objective indicators, designated verifiers, reasonable-efforts obligations, a long-stop date, an anti-prevention rule, and proportionate consequences.

References

Budiono, H. (2016). Perikatan bersyarat dan beberapa permasalahannya. Veritas et Justitia, 2(1), 86–111. https://doi.org/10.25123/vej.v2i1.2067

Chandra, T. (2022). Legal certainty of sale and purchase binding agreements as the basis for the transfer of certified land rights. Research Horizon, 2(6), 615–625.

Christiawan, R. (2020). Uji tuntas hukum: Legal due diligence. Sinar Grafika.

David, Y. (2024). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) factors in M&A due diligence: Legal obligations, risk assessment, and integration strategies. Risk Assessment, and Integration Strategies.

Erwiningsih, W. (2023). Enhancing legal certainty in land collateral: Bridging regulatory gaps, mitigating vulnerabilities, and promoting credit access in Indonesia. Croatian International Relations Review, 29(93), 26–49.

Gorgan, M., & Hartvigsen, M. (2022). Development of agricultural land markets in countries in Eastern Europe and Central Asia. Land Use Policy, 120.

Iman, A. N., & Alvisalia, Y. N. (2024). Hasil legal due diligence dan legal opini sebagai penentu harga akuisisi Bank Perekonomian Rakyat (BPR). Action Research Literate, 8(11), 3195–3201.

Kelley, B. A., & Mattei, A. M. (2020). Due Diligence in Mortgage Loan Sales and Acquisitions: Defining Process and Achieving Objectives (with Form). Prac. Real Est. Law., 36, 37.

Kurnia, I., Mulyati, E., & Lubis, N. A. (2022). Penerapan due diligence oleh notaris selaku kuasa dalam permohonan pendaftaran atas perubahan sertifikat jaminan fidusia online. ACTA DIURNAL Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan, 5(2), 235–250. https://doi.org/10.23920/acta.v5i2.920

Maki, I. S., Rohaini, R., Rusmawati, D. E., Wardani, Y. K., & Nurhasanah, S. (2026). Application of the principle of legal certainty in land ownership disputes in Pantai Sari Ringgung. Fox Justi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 16(2), 309–318.

Moreda, T. (2023). Beyond land rights registration: Understanding the mundane elements of land conflict in Ethiopia. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 50(5), 1791–1819.

Multazam, M. T., Phahlevy, R. R., Huzairin, R. A., & Purnama, M. I. (2022). Standards for conducting legal due diligence: Current developments. Indonesian Journal of Law and Economics Review, 15. https://doi.org/10.21070/ijler.v15i0.762

Pakpahan, K. (2022). Problems of implementation of electronic land certificate arrangements as debt guarantee. Prophetic Law Review, 70-91.

Paramudhita, R. R. (2025). The role of legal due diligence in ensuring legal certainty in business transactions in Indonesia. Cessie: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, 4(4).

Pereira, E. G., & Lewis, M. J. (2018). Conditions precedent in farmout agreements—An overview. International Review of Law, 272.

Sufa, M. I., Amalia, P., & Muchtar, H. N. (2025). Perkembangan implementasi due diligence bagi investor dalam penyelesaian sengketa mengenai legitimate expectation. Jurnal Kertha Semaya, 13(9), 1887–1901. https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2025.v13.i09.p03

Susilowardani. (2025). Analisis peran due diligence dan audit hukum terhadap kepastian hukum klausul buy back guarantee dalam perjanjian bisnis bank dan developer. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge, 5(6), 7299–7308.

Sutantoputra, M. W., & Simangunsong, S. (2018). Pedoman lengkap legal due diligence (LDD) dan legal opinion (LO) dalam rangka initial public offering (IPO). Andi.

Sutjiadi, A., & Rahayu, M. I. F. (2025). Land without rights: Judicial reasoning and the search for legal certainty. Era Hukum-Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum, 23(1), 41–58.

Tunio, M. H., Sanjrani, A. N., Shaikh, M. I., Shaikh, N. A., & Kehar, A. (2026). Blockchain-based temper-proof and decentralized framework for educational documents verification. Spectrum of Engineering Sciences, 4(2), 671–696.

Woods, L. (2024). Regulating to minimise harm to children and young people. Dalam Children, young people and online harms: Conceptualisations, experiences and responses (hlm. 141–168). Springer.