Corruption as a Human Rights Violation: The Urgency of Asset Forfeiture Mechanisms for Social Loss Recovery

Authors

  • Abdul Haris Semendawai Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah
  • Sukamto Kusnadi Universitas Islam As-Syafi'iyah

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59261/jlsp.v4i4.204

Keywords:

Corruption, Human Rights Violations, Asset Grabbing, Social Loss Recovery

Abstract

Background: Corruption is a systemic crime that harms state finances and may result in structural human rights violations by disrupting access to education, health care, social welfare, and development. Asset forfeiture is therefore important for recovering public resources and restoring the state’s capacity to provide public services.

Objective: This study examines the relationship between corruption, human rights, and the urgency of asset forfeiture by tracing the development of Indonesia’s anti-corruption legal framework, particularly Law No. 31 of 1999 jo. Law No. 20 of 2001 and the establishment of the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK).

Methods: A normative juridical approach and conceptual analysis were used to examine relevant legal regulations, institutional developments, and conceptual frameworks concerning anti-corruption enforcement and asset recovery.

Results: The analysis indicates that corruption may constitute a human rights violation because it deprives communities of socioeconomic rights and, in certain circumstances, may threaten the right to life. Asset forfeiture also has a restorative dimension by enabling the recovery and reuse of public resources for social development. The literature indicates that asset recovery can support public services, reduce inequality, restore public trust, and promote development. These findings support the relevance of non-conviction-based (NCB) asset forfeiture mechanisms.

Conclusion: Strengthening the legal framework for asset forfeiture, including the Asset Forfeiture Bill and improved governance of confiscated assets, is essential for recovering social losses, protecting human rights, and strengthening Indonesia’s anti-corruption system.

References

Arifin, R. and I. S. U. (2026). Economic Efficiency of Asset Recovery Mechanisms in Corruption Cases: A Law and Economics Approach . The Indonesian Journal of Economic Analysis of Law, 1(1), 103–136.

Bayuaji, R., & Hadi, F. (2025). Asset Recovery In Corruption Cases In Indonesia: A Human Rights Perspective. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v19no1.4024

Braithwaite, J. (2002). Restorative justice and responsive regulation (Vol. 10). Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Dame Marbun, R., Rijadi, P., Efendi, J., & Bhayangkara Surabaya, U. (2026). Asset Recovery Regulation in Corruption Cases: Comparative Legal Frameworks in Southeast Asia under the UNCAC Perspective. Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice, 18(01).

Detter, D., & Fölster, S. (2017). The public wealth of cities: How to unlock hidden assets to boost growth and prosperity. In The Public Wealth of Cities: How to Unlock Hidden Assets to Boost Growth and Prosperity.

El Siwi, Y. (2018). Mafia, money-laundering and the battle against criminal capital: the Italian case. Journal of Money Laundering Control, 21(2). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-02-2017-0009

Ghondohi, L. O., Said Karim, H. M., Muhadar, Rahman, A., & Maratovna, Y. A. (2025). Asset Recovery from Mining Corruption: Rationality, Urgency, and Challenges for Environmental Restoration. Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.62264/jlej.v3i2.172

Gilman, S. C. (2026). Taking the profit out of corruption: asset recovery – success or failure? In Handbook of Research Methods for Corruption Studies. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035337712.00014

Hariyanti, D., & Wibisono, D. K. (2026). State Asset Recovery from the Proceeds of Crime in Money Laundering in Indonesia: An Analysis of the Effectiveness and Urgency of Implementing Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture (NCB). Eduvest - Journal of Universal Studies, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.59188/eduvest.v6i4.52670

ICW – Indonesia Corruption Watch. (2023). Laporan Pemulihan Aset Korupsi.

ICW – Indonesia Corruption Watch. (2023). Laporan Tren Korupsi dan Pemulihan Aset di Indonesia.

Igbinedion, S. A., & Osobase, A. (2025). Grand corruption in the global south: Legal, political and economic analysis of assets recovery in Nigeria. Journal of Economic Criminology, 9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconc.2025.100164

Ikram, M. D. K. K. and S. S. (2026). State Loss Assessment in Transnational Corruption: Strengthening International Cooperation and Asset Recovery: State Loss Assessment in Transnational Corruption: Strengthening International Cooperation and Asset Recovery . PENA LAW: International Journal of Law, 4(1).

Kahangirwe, P., & Vanclay, F. (2024). Social impacts arising from road infrastructure projects in Sub-Saharan Africa: better management of social issues is needed in road construction, upgrading and rehabilitation. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 42(4). https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2024.2385877

Mauro, P. (1997). Why Worry About Corruption (eds) IMF Publications (Vol. 6). Economic Issues.

McDevitt, A. (2022). Supreme audit institutions anti-corruption strategies. Transparency International.

Muhammad Nurul Huda, Safira Ila Mardhatillah, Qurota Ayunisa, Amrina Munjiyah, & Afrizal Eko Nugroho. (2025). Non-Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture: Presumption of Innocence and Principle of Legality Perspective. Walisongo Law Review (Walrev), 7(1). https://doi.org/10.21580/walrev.2025.7.1.28205

Olujobi, O. J. (2021). Recouping proceeds of corruption: is there any need to reverse extant trends by enacting civil forfeiture legal regime in Nigeria? Journal of Money Laundering Control, 24(4). https://doi.org/10.1108/JMLC-09-2020-0107

Pavletic, I. (2009). Working Paper 7: The political economy of asset recovery processes. Basel Institute on Governance Working Papers. https://doi.org/10.12685/bigwp.2009.7.1-32

Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice.

Remeikien?, R., & Gaspareniene, L. (2023). Effects of Economic and Financial Crime on the Government Budget and the Quality of Public Services. In Contributions to Finance and Accounting: Part F1313. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-34082-6_8

Rudiyansah, M. M. D. H., & Rezki, Moch. G. F. (2025). The Impact of Corruption on Economic Development and Community Welfare from Local And National Perspectives. Abdurrauf Social Science, 2(2).

Setiawan, J. H., & Solikhin, S. (2025). THE URGENCY OF ENACTING ASSET FORFEITURE LEGISLATION IN THE RECOVERY OF STATE FINANCES FROM CORRUPTION. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5367190

UN Committee on ESCR. (2011). General Comments No. 12–19.

UNODC. (2019). Corruption and Human Rights Report.

Wicaksono, A. A., Hartiwiningsih, Rustamaji, M., Suwadi, P., & Nurviani, N. (2025). Non-Conviction-Based Confiscation as a Tool of Asset Forfeiture through an Indonesia’s Ecological Concept. Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice, 3(3). https://doi.org/10.62264/jlej.v3i3.180

World Bank – StAR. (2020). Asset Recovery Handbook.

World Bank – StAR Initiative. (2020). Asset Recovery Handbook.

Ywanjono, B. M., Hartiwiningsih, H., & Suwadi, P. (2024). Optimizing Recovery of State Losses: Effective Strategy for Tracing Corrupt Assets at the Investigation Stage. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-38476-315-3_50

Downloads

Published

2026-09-16

How to Cite

Semendawai, A. H., & Kusnadi, S. (2026). Corruption as a Human Rights Violation: The Urgency of Asset Forfeiture Mechanisms for Social Loss Recovery. Journal of Law and Social Politics, 4(4), 603–620. https://doi.org/10.59261/jlsp.v4i4.204