Certainty and Legal Protection of SHMSRS Holders Due to the Refusal to Extend or Renew the Right to Use Shared Land

Mohammad Ilham Riyadi; Hafiz Akbar; Edrick Edwardina Effendy

doi:10.59261/jlsp.v4i4.187

Authors

Mohammad Ilham Riyadi Universitas Pelita Harapan
Hafiz Akbar Universitas Pelita Harapan
Edrick Edwardina Effendy Universitas Pelita Harapan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59261/jlsp.v4i4.187

Keywords:

Building Use Rights (HGB), Shared Land, Consumer Protection, Legal Certainty, SHMSRS

Abstract

Background: The development of vertical housing in Indonesia has increased the need for legal certainty for holders of Apartment Ownership Certificates (SHMSRS). Problems arise because SHMSRS do not stand alone but are instead embedded in joint rights to common areas, common objects, and common land.

Objective: This study examines the epistemological shift from human judgment to algorithmic knowledge in the implementation of Financial Accounting Standards (SAK) and Quality Management Systems (SMM). Drawing on positivism, interpretivism, and pragmatism, it explores whether AI-generated outputs constitute valid accounting knowledge or merely computational representations of professional judgment.

Methods: This study employs a qualitative-interpretive approach through conceptual analysis and examination of practitioners’ perspectives on the reliability, transparency, explainability, and trustworthiness of AI-assisted decision-making.

Results: The findings show that AI enhances efficiency, predictive accuracy, and analytical capabilities in accounting and auditing. However, its application also creates epistemological challenges, including limited algorithmic transparency, reduced explainability, and the potential weakening of professional skepticism. The shift from assessment-based expertise to data-driven inferential knowledge alters the traditional epistemic authority of accountants and auditors. The implementation of SAK and SMM consequently requires clearer professional responsibility, human oversight, and accountability to maintain the quality of financial reporting and audit processes.

Conclusion: Legal protection needs to be built through preventive and repressive mechanisms, namely the obligation for transparency of land status by developers, strengthening of PPJB clauses, the role of notaries and PPAT, government supervision, access to consumer dispute resolution, and proportional compensation mechanisms if unit owners suffer losses.

References

Amir, N., Subhan, H., Santoso, U., Winarsih, S., & Anand, G. (2026). Regulating the Space Above Land in Indonesia: Toward a Business Law-Based Framework for Legal Certainty and Vertical Development. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v9i1.132400

Furqon, M., & Habib, M. (2022). Legal Aspects Of Flat Ownership In Indonesia. International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML), 1(3). https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v1i3.31

Hermawan, D., Kantikha, I. M., Judge, Z., & Fitria, A. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pemegang Sertifikat Hak Guna Bangunan di Atas Hak Pakai Barang Milik Negara. Almufi Jurnal Sosial Dan Humaniora, 2(2). https://doi.org/10.63821/ash.v2i2.454

Hidayatullah, F. G., & O, N. F. (2024). KEPEMILIKAN APARTEMEN (HGB) HAK GUNA BANGUNAN YANG DIBANGUN DI ATAS (SHM) SERTIFIKAT HAK MILIK PIHAK KETIGA. CERMIN: Jurnal Penelitian, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.36841/cermin_unars.v8i2.5904

Isnaini, I. (2025). Implications of Investment Policy on Legal Certainty of Community Land Rights. AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum Dan Pranata Sosial Islam, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.37680/almanhaj.v7i1.7883

Jamika, F. I., Monica, F., Fitri, M. M., Syafardi, Z., Barlian, E., Dewata, I., Umar, I., & Syah, N. (2023). Pemukiman Vertikal Sebagai Upaya Mengatasi Kepadatan Penduduk di Indonesia. Jurnal Kependudukan Dan Pembangunan Lingkungan, 4(1), 9–17.

Lesmana, M., & Anindita, S. L. (2021). Perlindungan Hukum Pembeli Apartemen Terkait Transparansi Informasi Status Hak Atas Tanah Bersama Apartemen: Legal Protection of Apartment Buyers Related to Transparency of Shared Land Rights Status Information. Reformasi Hukum, 25(2).

Maharani, M., Busro, A., & Priyono, E. A. (2021). ANALISIS PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM (TORTIUS ACT) DALAM SENGKETA APARTEMEN MANGGA DUA COURT (STUDI KASUS PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 364 PK/Pdt/2016). DIPONEGORO LAW JOURNAL, 10(2).

Martin, A. Y. (2025). Reconstruction of Ownership Rights of Apartment Unit Built on Land with Building Rights. JURNAL ILMIAH GEMA PERENCANA, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.61860/jigp.v4i2.400

Mudakir Iskandar Syah, S. H. M. H. (2019). Panduan mengurus sertifikat dan penyelesaian sengketa tanah. Bhuana ilmu populer.

Namira, R. V. P. and D. P. (2025). Perlindungan Hukum Pemilik Sertifikat Hak Milik Satuan Rumah Susun atas Kehancuran Unit Apartemen." 6.9 (2025). Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis, 6(9).

Onny Medaline, S. H. , and M. K. (2024). Pembaharuan Hukum Pendaftaran Tanah: Narasi Epistemik Pendaftaran Tanah Dalam Tatanan Pemberlakuan Uu Cipta KerjA. umsu press.

Setiawati, A. (2023). Shifting the Concept of Flats Ownership in Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-2-494069-49-7_110

Sihite, S., & Widjaja, G. (2025). Tinjauan Yuridis Terhadap Tata Cara Perpanjangan Hak Guna Bangunan atas Tanah Negara di Indonesia. Jurnal Tana Mana, 6(3).

Stella, S., & Djaja, B. (2026). Perbandingan Kepastian Hukum Kepemilikan Rumah Susun Di Indonesia Dan Singapura. Jurnal Usm Law Review, 9(3), 1610–1627.

Sugita, S., Abdullah, A. G., & Djajaputra, G. (2020). Limitation legal certainty of long-term flat unit ownership related to flat building ownership. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 8(3). https://doi.org/10.47277/jett/8(3)1199

Susanto, I. M. H., & R., I. (2020). Legal Status of Flat Unit Ownership Certificate (Strata Title) in Indonesia. PRIZREN SOCIAL SCIENCE JOURNAL, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.32936/pssj.v4i2.155

Suwardi, S. and M. A. S. (2026). Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pengembang Properti terhadap Konsumen atas Tidak Terbangunnya Apartemen dengan Ikatan Perjanjian. MARAS: Jurnal Penelitian Multidisiplin, 4(2), 610–619.

Tanthowi, I., Herlindah, H., & Supriyadi. (2024). Legal Certainty for the Increase of HGB to Right of Ownership of Shops/Office Houses. Legal Horizons, 20(1). https://doi.org/10.54477/lh.25192353.2024.1.pp.25-36

Wahyuddin, Kusumadara, A., & Hardiyantina, S. (2025). Legal Implications Of Granting Ownership Rights Of Apartment Units Built On Right-To-Build Title To Foreign Nationals. Indonesia Law Reform Journal, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.22219/ilrej.v5i2.39416

Weydhani Putri, A. A., Agustini, S., & Jaya, F. (2024). Perlindungan Hukum Pemegang Sertifikat Hak Guna Bangunan Yang Tumpang Tindih Dengan Kawasan Hutan Lindung. Jurnal Bedah Hukum, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.36596/jbh.v8i1.1254

Wijaya, L. R. M., Dajaan, S. S., & Suwandono, A. (2018). PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN DALAM PRE PROJECT SELLING APARTEMEN MELALUI IKLAN DALAM PERSPEKTF PERBANDINGAN DI INDONESIA DAN TIONGKOK. Acta Diurnal Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Dan Ke-PPAT-An, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.24198/acta.v1i2.116

Yakob Udi, D. Y. (2018). Upgrading Status of Right to Builds (HGB) Above The Right Management (HPL) Perumnas to Become Ownership Right (HM) (Case Study at Korpri Housing Bangetayu Wetan Semarang). Jurnal Akta, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v5i3.3264