Engaging a School’s Leadership Team in Re-envisioning Professional Learning for Public Secondary Educators through the PAR Experience in Cambodia

Authors

  • Sarom Mok Royal University of Phnom Penh, Cambodia
  • Ramy Chhun Ministry of Education, Youtth and Sport, Cambodia
  • Sophay Sim National AIDS Authority, Cambodia
  • Satya Yen NEAVEA OBROM Training Center, Cambodia
  • Sophal Yoeun Preah Sihamoniraja Budhist University, Cambodia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59261/jlsp.v4i1.178

Keywords:

School’s Leadership Team, Re-envision, Professional Learning, Participatory Action Research, Public Secondary, Educators, Cambodia

Abstract

Background: Professional development (PD) for public secondary educators is commonly one-size-fits-all, fragmented, and short-term, lacking a coherent vision for collaborative teaching and learning. Such opportunities rarely model the creativity and depth required in classrooms, leading teachers to doubt district-mandated sessions and limit participation to compulsory trainings. Despite growing interest in Participatory Action Research (PAR), little evidence exists on how it can reshape professional learning within Cambodian secondary schools.

Objective: This study examined the experiences of a school’s leadership team as participants in PAR to identify the resources educators need to acquire the skills and knowledge that make a difference for students.

Methods: Grounded in teamwork, the PAR positioned participants as co-researchers who assessed resource needs, reviewed existing procedures, and devised workable plans; the study was conducted with participants rather than on them to bridge research and practice.

Results: Findings revealed the need for a more diversified, transparent, and strategic PD framework, including expanded online and hybrid options, clearer training requirements, differentiation by experience, subject, and role, stronger peer collaboration and learning committees, and attention to structural barriers such as workload, coverage, and funding.

Conclusion: A collaborative PAR approach empowers educators to own their PD, producing relevant, context-responsive systems that enhance teacher practice and student achievement.

References

Admiraal, W., Schenke, W., De Jong, L., Emmelot, Y., & Sligte, H. (2021). Schools as professional learning communities: what can schools do to support professional development of their teachers? Professional Development in Education, 47(4), 684–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1665573

Barth, R. S. (1990). Improving schools from within: Teachers, parents, and principals can make the difference.

Brydon?Miller, M., & Maguire, P. (2009). Participatory action research: contributions to the development of practitioner inquiry in education. Educational Action Research, 17(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650790802667469

Chamraeun, S., Mok, S., Hor, M., Chhun, R., & Em, S. (2026). The influence of academic leadership styles on school culture within secondary resource schools in Cambodia. Journal of General Education and Humanities, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.58421/gehu.v5i2.887

Colbert, J., Brown, R., Choi, S.(2008.). An investigation of the impacts of teacher-driven professional development on pedagogy and student learning. JSTORJA Colbert, RS Brown, SH Choi, S ThomasTeacher Education Quarterly, 2008•JSTOR. Retrieved August 22, 2026, from https://www.jstor.org/stable/23479228

Dana, N., & Yendol-Hoppey, D. (2009). The reflective educator’s guide to classroom research: Learning to teach and teaching to learn through practitioner inquiry.

Darling-Hammond, L., Hyler, M. (2017). Effective teacher professional development. ERICL Darling-Hammond, ME Hyler, M GardnerLearning Policy Institute, 2017•ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED606743

Desimone, L. M. (2009). Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181–199. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X08331140

Desimone, L. M., Porter, A. C., Garet, M. S., Yoon, S., Birman, B. F., & Kwang, M. S. G. (2002). Effects of professional development on teachers’ instruction: Results from a three-year longitudinal study. Journals.Sagepub.ComLM Desimone, AC Porter, MS Garet, KS Yoon, BF BirmanEducational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 2002•journals.Sagepub.Com, 24(2), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/01623737

DuFour, R., & Eaker, R. (2009). Professional learning communities at work tm: best practices for enhancing students achievement.

Francies, C., Glover, S. (2021). Enhancing Teacher Preparation through Clinical Experience. Policy Brief. ERICC Francies, S Glover, C JamiesonEducation Commission of the States, 2021•ERIC.

Friere, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed.

Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What Makes Professional Development Effective? Results From a National Sample of Teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/00028312038004915

Goodwin, B. (2010). Changing the Odds for Student Success: What Matters Most. A Special Issue of" Changing Schools". ERICB GoodwinMid-Continent Research for Education and Learning (McREL), 2010•ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED544634

Goodwin, B. (2024). Designing Better Professional Learning with the Brain in Mind. ERICB Goodwin, K RouleauMcREL International, 2024•ERIC.

Guskey, T. (2002). Does it make a difference? Evaluating professional development. Uknowledge.Uky.Edu.

Hang, C. (2017). Education management reform strategies for enhancing the quality citizenship in Cambodia. https://digital.car.chula.ac.th/chulaetd/681/

Hellerich, K. (2024). Leading Participatory Action Research for Teacher Agency. Journal of Educational Leadership in Action, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.62608/2164-1102.1152

Ingersoll, R., Merrill, L. (2014). Seven Trends: The Transformation of the Teaching Force. Updated April 2014. CPRE Report.# RR-80. ERICR Ingersoll, L Merrill, D StuckeyConsortium for Policy Research in Education, 2014•ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED566879

Kemmis, S., McTaggart, R., & Nixon, R. (2014). The action research planner: Doing critical participatory action research. The Action Research Planner: Doing Critical Participatory Action Research, 1–200. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-4560-67-2

Lapidot-Lefler, N. (2025). Empowering connections: participatory action research in teacher education with vulnerable youth. Educational Action Research, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/09650792.2025.2590022

Leavy, P. (2022). Research design: Quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods, arts-based, and community-based participatory research approaches.

Lim, S. (2023). Impact of school directors’ leadership behaviors on teachers’ morale: A case study of secondary resource schools in Cambodia.

Lunenburg, F. (2010). Managing change: The role of the change agent. Mlsu.Ac.InFC LunenburgInternational Journal of Management, Business, and Administration, 2010•mlsu.Ac.In, 13. https://www.mlsu.ac.in/econtents/1081_Managing Change The Role of Change Agent Unit-3.pdf

Menter, I., Elliot, D., Hulme, M., Lewin, J., & Lowden, K. (2011). A guide to practitioner research in education. https://sk.sagepub.com/book/mono/preview/a-guide-to-practitioner-research-in-education.pdf

Mertens, D. (2008). Transformative research and evaluation.

Morrissey, M. (2000). Professional learning communities: An ongoing exploration. https://allthingsplc.info/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/plc-ongoing.pdf

Nahal, S. P. (2010). Voices from the field: Perspectives of first-year teachers on the disconnect between teacher preparation programs and the realities of the classroom.

Ngah, N. S., Abdullah, N. L., Mohd Suki, N., & Kasim, M. A. (2023). Does servant leadership affect organisational citizenship behaviour? Mediating role of affective commitment and moderating role of role identity of young volunteers in non-profit organisations. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 44(6), 681–701. https://doi.org/10.1108/LODJ-11-2022-0484

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. Journals.Sagepub.ComLS Nowell, JM Norris, DE White, NJ MoulesInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2017•journals.Sagepub.Com, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847

Opfer, V. D., & Pedder, D. (2011). Conceptualizing Teacher Professional Learning. Review of Educational Research, 81(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311413609

Scherff, L. (2018). Distinguishing professional learning from professional development.

Talakoub, C. (2020). Digital Professional Learning for K-12 Teachers: Literature Review and Analysis. Knowledge Brief. ERICC TalakoubRegion 15 Comprehensive Center, 2020•ERIC. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=eD610097

Taylor, S. (2024). Examining PK-12 Teachers’ Perceptions of Professional Development’s Effect on Improving Instructional Practice and Student Learning.

Timperley, H. (2011). Realizing the power of professional learning.

Timperley, H., Wilson, A., Barrar, H., & Fung, I. (2007). Teacher Professional Learning and Development. Chamilo.Ektproject.Eu. https://chamilo.ektproject.eu/courses/POTUSHIRE2/tincan/MIE-Unit-2.-Action-Research-in-the-Classroom/resources/1d0b95timperleyetal2007.pdf

Trust, T., Krutka, D. (2016). “Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. ElsevierT Trust, DG Krutka, JP CarpenterComputers & Education, 2016•Elsevier. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036013151630135X

Downloads

Published

2026-09-03

How to Cite

Mok, S., Chhun, R., Sim, S., Yen, S., & Yoeun, S. (2026). Engaging a School’s Leadership Team in Re-envisioning Professional Learning for Public Secondary Educators through the PAR Experience in Cambodia. Journal of Law and Social Politics, 4(1), 60–74. https://doi.org/10.59261/jlsp.v4i1.178